“what it’s like to see red, to hear rainfall, or to feel angry or happy “qualia.””

You refuse to accept that it was demonstrated (and it is observable – something which you refuse to do) that what you call qualia is merely a conglomerate of raw perceptions relative to other perceptions, in human case also intertwined with symbolic thinking. Qualities are in essence illusions. I understand that it puts your whole concept of aesthetics out of the window. Well, it's hard to part with years upon years of armchair speculations (was that your PhD thesis?) that proved to be false and based on wrong assumptions ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

“Einsteinian physics breaks down within the black hole”

Only that it doesn't. Einsteinian physics predicted black holes (see e.g. Schwarzschild). I already hear you emphasizing the word “within” in some cheap semantic cop-out, but let me assure you, physics works perfectly fine within black holes.

“Thus, all living things are parasites.”

Speak for yourself :D Btw. e.g. stars “devour” planets when conditions are right (sure, not in order to survive). And that's just one of many, many other examples. Whole cosmos operates in "Ouroborian mode." Living and nonliving alike. Your hate of life is a sight to behold nevertheless.

All in all, you have a way with words. I give you that. But you are IMO too uneducated and inexperienced to even dabble in philosophy. And being obstinate when you are presented with facts that falsify your ideas does not help either. It was nice while it lasted, but this leads nowhere. Over and out.