The only problem with this is that the duality itself is illusory. You never experienced anything beyond your mind. It's an illusion that your “thoughts about this topic are not exactly the same as the computer I am recording them on”. They are identical. The only difference is that what you call thought is a pure mind feedback (hence directly mouldable by mind), whereas what you call computer is the mind representation of rules that govern also the formation of mind (hence you e.g. cannot “unthink” death).

I already brought the following to your attention, but I feel like I have to do it again.

https://senderspike.medium.com/fractal-evolution-b0d66bacff40

https://senderspike.medium.com/circle-of-growth-fef31636e538

Also, I'm not sure whether you understand the nature of “ontological primitive”. First, for obvious reasons, one cannot be outside of, or beyond, space-time in spatio-temporal terms. Second, (which pertains to “within” aka transcendent immanence) it's crucial to always keep in mind that “ontological primitive” is neither a thing nor a substance or some such (yet, it is still what you are). Hence you may sometimes hear people insisting that in reality there is no one anywhere which is also where the idea of creation ex nihilo has its roots.

The nature of “ontological primitive”, however, can be only known, one cannot reason it out. Then again, it's enough to know your own nature and you will know the nature of “ontological primitive”. Quite obviously.