The only problem with that conference is that it resembled more a get-together of fantasy authors than a serious scientific endeavor. I really cannot take it seriously, and I'm pretty much in line with Bruce Bassett and his assessment of the whole event:

https://www.mnassa.org.za/html/Dec2005/2005MNASSA..64..Dec..186.pdf

If you want to argue with hot BB, there is always cold BB (inflation followed by “hot bang”) and also other theories that may prove correct. Not the ones you bring to the table though. Are you per chance also anti-vaxx and deny (anthropogenic) global warming? I ask because the “science” you are consistently picking in support of your ideas is in the same camp – anti, pseudo, speculative but not exactly science as such.