My response was neither a dissertation nor an article. Please, go through the references in that wiki entry, such as these:

https://astro.ucla.edu/~wright/tiredlit.htm

https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9806201

In any case. While I agree that science and academia are rather bigoted in some areas, your criticism consistently barks up the wrong tree and attacks fundamentals demonstrated by observation to a reasonable level of probability, all the while you rely on old, but still lingering, hypotheses that were already falsified long time ago. I really don't understand what's your overall motivation. Do you want to demonstrate that science is wrong about some spiritual interpretations as you presented them? I'm afraid, you are on a rather quixotic quest.