Is this really about seeing the future or just about real-time monitoring, thus increasing the granularity of (also) possible predictions? Also, how much impact has the quality of prediction algorithm on the whole thing? (Did I at least understood it correctly? :D)
Every expectation can be experienced by an observer under an amount of energy… God lets us play dice and we can throw whatever we want to have on our dice. It’s upon us as far as it’s worthy to us.
Ah, I had to go back to your article to digest it — math was never my forte :D
I’m not sure we are as free as to throw whatever we want. I always imagine a swimmer in a mighty river. There’s definitely freedom of movement, but it depends, as you state, on the amount of available energy which is, however, not unlimited. I can of course dream/hallucinate even about reversing the flow of said river with just a wave of the hand, but what utility has such experience except of a “wow effect”? Hm, I have the suspicion that I don’t get the full implications of your idea.
And there’s also one more thing, I’m not sure, maybe it’s just a matter of semantics, but —
there is a possibility to run out of this world. Then it will immediately augment itself with this expectation to make it experienceable.
Where exactly is the place that is out of this world? Especially when I consider that all concepts like time and space, or inside and outside are in itself (no matter if emergent or not) phenomena of the very world we are talking about. On the other hand, when we run out of known perception patterns, our minds construct our experience of the unknown out of the parts of what we already know — is that what you meant?
I would also argue that basically/technically there’s but one observer (not separate from the observed), but that is probably just splitting the hairs. Anyway, if I should recommend some article of mine, I would recommend this:
