Indeed, you are going pretty deep in your articles. In fact, deeper than most writers I know (of). Still, you can go deeper.

Of course, it's not just a conspiracy theory that "perception and understanding with concepts" can lead to alienation. That's what we have -- dreamlike perception combined with cultural interpretations that fuel the feelings of separation. However, you cannot equate that outcome with consciousness, neither can you consider it to be an inborn human attribute.

For starters, that "complete mystical awareness" is merely the outcome of letting go of all those aforementioned (learned/acquired) concepts while not being led astray by raw perceptions -- as I said many times, there's no "mystical" experience that equals or automatically leads to enlightenment. Letting go of concepts and interpretations clearly reveals their learned nature (if you can get rid of it, it's definitely not inborn), and knowing oneself as the singular subjective observer clearly dispels the misleading nature of perception. As you can see, when you treat yourself in totality, you have all you need to not fall for concepts or perceptual laterna magica.

Thus, a mystic is just a person utterly devoid of socio-biological conditioning. Or at least a person who can identify that conditioning as such ("seeing the truth" does not mean that all illusions magically cease to be -- a mystic is still the same human after enlightenment as they were before). It's only natural, then, that such person talks about "unenlightened people's alienation from reality" because they've been there, too. They see how people cling to false concepts (alienation, happiness, power, meaning, etc.) or extravagant dreams (aka experiences), they understand how each of us were brought up that way, and they also understand how all those conditionings mutate and spread to next generations.

All in all, as descriptions of status quo, your articles are spot on. As final verdicts about nature of reality, not so much. Hence I say, go deeper.