I wonder how can you agree with what I said. I say that, strictly speaking, I am not my thoughts and definitely not the thoughts of others, and that is the exact opposite of your conclusions. I am that which knows the thoughts. Even though, yes, the thoughts are nothing other than me. In other words I am not my manifestations, even though I am not separate from them. I am the uncaused cause, and it's not thinking.

As I said, I also verified (and anyone can do so, too) that I am and therefore I think, not the other way round, by which I mean that even without thinking there's a knowable ground of consciousness / being. That is, that which "I am" points at, because as I said elsewhere, those are, too, just words, learned human constructs (albeit, denoting reality). Well, my hunch was spot on with that Descartes joke. Suffice to say, he was (verifiably) wrong.

Also, I would like to know what motivates a person who claims to "crack" the deepest secrets of the universe to sell that knowledge on Amazon.