Sender Spike
1 min readFeb 13, 2022

--

I think that scientists are ok. After all, e.g. quantum mechanics is a great and very apt generalization. Considering that everything up to mind and awareness can be derived from it (and is repeatedly testable) the only major question that remains is consciousness (the rest are just functional details, principles are solid). But as Einstein does not invalidate Newton, I don't see any incompatibility between modern science and realization that what science describes and studies is in essence the structure of dream arising in otherwise unsubstantial consciousness (which is all there is). Well, but providing that overarching view should be the job of philosophy, which, however, appears to be in shambles in this day and age. So that’s that.

In any case, I understand that when you look at reality you see Yin-Yang, and there's nothing wrong with it, I just say that I see it as Tao (which, again, does not invalidate that it appears as Yin-Yang and subsequently multiplicity).

https://senderspike.medium.com/mind-brain-and-consciousness-9127f14dea4

https://senderspike.medium.com/absolute-equivalence-b4584dc2e290

https://senderspike.medium.com/yet-another-creation-myth-1ad36f9815de

--

--

Responses (1)