I guess, you ask if I believe in literal resurrection. I had to google the word "resurrectionist" and all dictionaries say that it means "body snatcher". Lol. Well, my answer is no. I neither steal bodies to resurrect them, nor do I consider Jesus' literal resurrection as, even remotely, plausible. Furthermore and despite beliefs of (perhaps all) Christians, literal resurrection is utterly inconsequential in the context of Jesus' message, even if such feat was physically possible (which, to be completely honest, I cannot rule out with 100% certainty).

To put it very simply -- as I see it, Jesus was to Judaism what Buddha was to Vedic Hinduism (or Lao Tzu to Chinese shamanism) in that they tried to return their respective traditions back to their non-dual roots. They were physical demonstrations that both, Judaism and Vedic Hinduism, indeed lead to self-realization (aka enlightenment or recognition of non-dual nature of reality). Alas, both men, exactly as their predecessors, were criminally misunderstood by their followers.

Thus, conditionalism (had to google that one too) is just a perversion of a simple fact that, if one wishes to "attain" self-realization by following Jesus' way, one has to have faith in what he says. Exactly as a budding chemist who has to have faith that NaOH + HCl -> NaCl + H2O. Nothing more nothing less.

If you are interested in more info with regard to my position on the whole issue, read the articles I linked to in the original piece, and you may as well be interested in the following:

https://senderspike.medium.com/brutal-honesty-503f472648b1

https://senderspike.medium.com/gospel-revealed-694ee46882e

https://senderspike.medium.com/christ-buddha-and-the-new-reformation-92583edd35aa

https://medium.com/@senderspike/one-way-68601ea7a5d2

https://senderspike.medium.com/from-animism-to-non-duality-c12eb05fb439