Laura Knight-Jadczyk’s channeling

I guess, I should have separated it: Laura Knight-Jadczyk — no comment O_o; channeling — interesting, but give me someone more reliable than that lady. Anyway, if I should make my take on channeling, it’s giving way to a fully formed sub-conscious alter ego(s) (Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hide style). For more details you may reread my article on reincarnation, and how it can be explained (it basically deals with accessibility of information, which applies to many of the so-called mystical phenomena).

the experiencer is crazy or fraudulent. They don’t establish that empirically, they just presume it and look away.

I looked at Mrs. Jadczyk’s web page, by which I empirically established — no comment O_o.

you demanded a theory that places God in the physical, so I gave you one. Now test it. See, that’s what scientists should be doing

Yes, that was exactly what I was asking. And you formulated a definition, “God is the conscious universal mind that exists in that dimension of physical reality we can’t see, hear, etc.”, to which I replied that if that was the case you could not have what you call “experiences of God” because in the moment of those experiences, God has to interact with reality that is perceivable the way we are. There was no need for test, because simple reasoning was enough to refute your idea. Then there was the possibility that you have some kind of special sense, in which case only people with that special faculty can devise valid scientific tools to study the phenomena and make it accessible (at least in the form of explanation) to the people who lack that special sense.

Not to get too personal, but this quote could as easily have been sent to you

When I wrote “As it is, you are looking for a way to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God,” I meant that even Biblical Jesus, a highly developed spiritual being, considered himself a man with five senses, mind, and a body of flesh (no special senses — like every other human). Therefore I emphasized that word — a man. I guess, I should have used a sentence with different overall meaning or emphasize also the word heard.

So what’s the difference between you and her? You don’t have to answer that in the public square on Medium, but it is food for thought.

I’ll gladly do it — essentially there is no difference. I am that lady as she is me. Then again there are obviously many differences in our particular manifestations ;)